Financial Adviser's Duty to Advise with respect to the Tax Implications of an Insurance Policy
Some Advisers and Industry Consultants believe that it is not the role of Financial Advisers to consider or give advice with respect to the tax implications of a Financial Product (such as an Insurance Policy) that they are recommending.
This extends to the method of ownership of the Policy and the tax implications of the method of ownership.
By implication, they are trying to pass responsibility for these decisions on to the Client.
ASIC's View (QFS 153)
ASIC's view is set out in QFS 153:
"The competency requirements do not require you, as a financial planner, to have an expert knowledge of every aspect of tax law.
"However, they do require you to have adequate knowledge of the tax implications normally applicable to the products on which you advise or that need to be considered in providing your advice.
"You must also have a general knowledge of tax law and practice sufficient to enable you to identify any other material tax issues on which your client may require further advice.
"This is so that you avoid making a recommendation about financial products that is not based on the advice of a person competent to provide advice on those issues.
...
"[PS 175] includes guidance on the level of client inquiries and the level of consideration to be given to the subject matter of the advice, and what constitutes ‘appropriate’ advice.
"If you are a providing entity, you generally must consider and investigate the financial products, classes of financial product and strategies upon which advice is provided.
"This will include consideration of any material tax implications of the advice.
"The client’s tax position may be relevant to assessment of the client’s relevant personal circumstances.
"Complex advice involving complex tax strategies is likely to involve more inquiry about the client’s tax position than relatively simple advice.
"We consider that there are two possible ways that a providing entity can give appropriate advice when there are material tax implications that the client should consider that go beyond the licensee’s competency:
• the advice can be based on competent tax advice given to the client by someone else; or
• the advice can be limited to those matters on which the licensee is competent to advise.
If you are a providing entity providing advice in these circumstances, you must be aware of the limitations on your competency.
If you are a licensee you must, however, in all cases ensure that you and your authorised representatives maintain the degree of competency required by [PS 146]."
Normal Tax Implications of Financial Product Advice
ASIC differentiates between:
It regards an adequate knowledge of the normal tax implications of a Financial Product (such as an Insurance Policy) as a condition of PS146 compliance.
The method of ownership of a Policy and the tax implications of its ownership are relevant in every case and therefore must be viewed as normal and fundamental aspects of the advice given by a Financial Adviser.
Copyright: Clover Law Pty Ltd |
Adviser Tip
The One Page Strategy is designed to help you simplify Succession Planning.
It helps you understand your needs, it helps you quantify them, it helps you cost them, and it helps you prioritise them.
See more Adviser Tips
Please contact us to arrange a meeting or teleconference. |
